Brendan Jurd wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Ron Mayer <rm_pg@cheapcomplexdevices.com> wrote:
>> Hmmm... Certainly what I had in datatype.sgml was wrong, but I'm
>> now thinking 5.5.4.2.1 and 5.5.4.2.2 would be the most clear?
>
> Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by "5.5.4.2.1". In the spec
Ah! That 5.5.4.2.1 comes from apparently an old Oct 2000
draft version of the spec titled ISO/FDIS 8601. (For now you can
see it here: http://0ape.com/postgres_interval_patches/ISO-FDIS-8601.pdf )
I'll fix all the links to point to the 2004 spec.