Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Дата
Msg-id 4934EF9E.7040600@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> After thinking about it I'm inclined to feel that SS and friends should
> insist on exactly 2 digits.  If you want to allow 1-or-2-digits then use
> FMSS, just like the error message tells you.  (However, I have a vague
> feeling that Oracle doesn't insist on this, and in the end we ought to
> follow Oracle's behavior.  Can anyone check?)

Oracle doesn't insist on it.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: KaiGai Kohei
Дата:
Сообщение: Updates of SE-PostgreSQL 8.4devel patches (r1268)
Следующее
От: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Дата:
Сообщение: contrib/pg_stat_statements 1202