Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Дата
Msg-id 4A241090.EE98.0025.1@wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> So, at least theoretically, anyone who had a traffic mix similar to
> TPCE would benefit.  Particularly, some long-running serializable
> transactions thrown into a mix of Read Committed and Repeatable
> Read transactions, for a stored procedure driven application.
A belated thought.  The proposed technique does yield different
behavior from traditional techniques for Read Committed and Repeatable
Read transactions which are run concurrently with Serializable
transactions.  In traditional blocking techniques, even a Read
Committed transaction only sees the database in a state consistent
with some serial execution of the serializable transactions.  As far
as I can see, this is not required by the SQL standard, but it might
possibly be an implementation artifact upon which some software might
rely.  Any idea whether this is the case with the TPC-E benchmark?
-Kevin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Suggested TODO: allow ALTERing of typemods without heap/index rebuild