Re: [sysadmins] List moderation - need a break!

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>> On 23 jun 2009, at 12.14, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Dave Page wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ultimately it seems the failure to fix this problem is just because
>>>>>>> Marc is the only one able to do it, and he's not around enough.
>>>>>> No, the real problem is having our mail infrastructure tied into
>>>>>> hub.org as a number of us have said before.
>>>>> Now that I have those two new servers in place, if someone wants to
>>>>> setup spamassassin on that VPS itself to run instead of going through
>>>>> the global spamassassin daemon, I'm cool with that ... I haven't moved
>>>>> mail over to the new servers yet, but that just takes 15-20 minutes of
>>>>> downtime to make happen ... could do that tomorrow evening ...
>>>> Just to be absolutely clear on what you're saying here.
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying that you are now OK with de-coupling the postgresql.org
>>>> mail from hub.org making it a community managed service?
>>>>
>>>> Or are you saying that you're ok with running a *second* instance of
>>>> spamassassin, and still keep mail going through hub.org relays?
>>> I'm okay with a dedicated instance of spamassassin running in
>>> mail.postgresql.org so that it can be more tailored / configured to mark
>>> spam going through to the moderators ...
>> So you're still not accepting that the mail services are a community service
>> and resource.  Ok, sorry to hear that, but good to know.
>>
>> In that case, the the statement by Dave still stands - this does not fix the
>> actual issue. It does paint over one crack a bit, but it does nothing to fix
>> the structural problem.
> 
> Since I'm new here, what is the structural problem?

Well, as Dave said earlier: everything about the email handling is
deeply integrated in the hub.org systems.

Which are not maintained by the community (they're maintained by hub.org
== Marc (who is a member of the community of course, but that doesn't
make it a community service)), not documented (at least not in a way
that is available and useful to the community), designed with all of
hub.org in mind and not focused on the needs of postgresql.org etc.

The only part that is running on a community managed VM is the majordomo
install. Relay in *and* out of it, spamfilter, graylisting, etc, etc, is
all hub.org.


Feel free to browse the archives for previous discussions on this topic :-P

-- Magnus HaganderSelf: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/