Re: Sequence "self" change - possible?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: Sequence "self" change - possible?
Дата
Msg-id 4ED44582.4080306@ringerc.id.au
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Sequence "self" change - possible?  (Lukasz Brodziak <lukasz.brodziak@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
On 11/28/2011 10:04 PM, Lukasz Brodziak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible for sequence to decrement its value by itself? Or is it
> possible to see wether it was changed by someone. The thing is that on
> one of our clinet's DB sequence rolled back to the state from 8 months ago.

It shouldn't generally be possible, no. It'd have to be changed by a
call to nextval(), setval() or the like, or a direct UPDATE to the
underlying sequence pseudo-table.

Could someone have tried to restore a backup from 8 months ago? That'd
result in a setval(...) call when pg_restore or psql (depending on
backup format) tried to set the sequence position.

In your case, though, your next post mentions possible database
corruption, so I'm wondering if this is related. If something's been
scribbling over the database files, someone's half-restored an old
file-level backup, or something similarly horrible then anything could
happen.

--
Craig Ringer


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info)
Следующее
От: Craig Ringer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Database is in recovery mode.