On 09/12/12 5:00 PM, Wells Oliver wrote:
> We have a few tables that are updated nightly on the order
> of deleting and inserting 500k records.
>
> I assumed autovacuum would do its thing and clean up the dead tuples,
> but in looking at pg_stat_user_tables, I notice there are lots and
> lots of dead tuples, on the order of a 500-600k.
>
> What can I do about this? Why isn't autovacuum cleaning these tables?
> Is this number of dead tuples acceptable?
>
> Lastly, would it make sense to do a weekly full manual vacuum + analyze?
>
how old is the oldest transaction in pg_stat_activity ? vacuum can't
free any tuples newer than this.
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast