Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Timothy Madden
Тема Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Дата
Msg-id 5078d8af0910251606r262f26bfn5290b539b5aa3b68@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Adrian Klaver <aklaver@comcast.net>)
Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-general

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
Timothy Madden escribió:

> Anyway Posgres offers a CREATE FUNCTION statement that resembles or should
> resemble that in the standard, and that is what I am talking about.

"Should" being the operative word in that sentence.  If you want to
submit a patch to move us closer towards the SQL/PSM goal, I'm sure it
will be welcome.

You know that takes quite some effort to invest. How are you sure a patch for this  will be
welcome when people here mostly disagree with me ?
 
 
> I just want the Postgres version of the statement to look more like
> the standard one.

Sure.  If we weren't all pointing in that general direction, we would
probably have CONNECT BY instead of WITH RECURSIVE.

I don't understand, what CONNECT BY or WITH RECURSIVE ?


Thank you,
Timothy Madden

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?
Следующее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can the string literal syntax for function definitions please be dropped ?