Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM
Дата
Msg-id 50855EDD.4050705@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/22/2012 10:18 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout
> <kleptog@svana.org> wrote:
>> It bugs me every time you have to jump through hoops and get red
>> warnings for an unknown CA, whereas no encryption whatsoever is treated
>> as fine while being actually even worse.
> +1.  Amen, brother.
>

Not really, IMNSHO. The difference is that an unencrypted session isn't 
pretending to be secure. In any case, it doesn't seem too intrusive for 
us to warn, at least in psql, with something like:
    SSL connection (cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits: 256) Host 
Certificate Unverified

If people want to get more paranoid they can always set PGSSLMODE to 
verify-ca or verify-full.


cheers

andrew



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Deprecations in authentication
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM