[RFC] pgstattuple/pgstatindex enhancement

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Satoshi Nagayasu
Тема [RFC] pgstattuple/pgstatindex enhancement
Дата
Msg-id 511A5E3C.9060105@uptime.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [RFC] pgstattuple/pgstatindex enhancement  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I'm thinking of pgstattuple/pgstatindex enhancement.

There are a few things I need to change, but I'd like to have
some comments and suggestions from hackers before tackling.

(1) Fix pgstatindex arguments to work same as pgstattuple.

As the document describes, pgstattuple accepts 'schema.table'
expression and oid of the table, but pgstatindex doesn't.
(because I didn't add that when I created pgstatindex...)

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/pgstattuple.html

So, I'd like to change pgstatindex arguments to allow
schema name and oid.

Does it make sense?

(2) Enhance pgstattuple/pgstatindex to allow block sampling.

Now, we have large tables and indexes in PostgreSQL, and these are
growing day by day.

pgstattuple and pgstatindex are both very important to keep database
performance well, but doing full-scans on large tables and indexes
would generate big performance impact.

So, now I think pgstattuple and pgstatindex should support
'block sampling' to collect block statistics with avoiding full-scans.

With this block sampling feature, pgstattuple/pgstatindex would be
able to collect block statistics from 1~10% of the blocks in the
table/index if the table/index is large (maybe 10GB or more).

It would allow us to run pgstattuple/pgstatindex easier.

Is it worth having?

Any comments?

Regards,
-- 
Satoshi Nagayasu <snaga@uptime.jp>
Uptime Technologies, LLC. http://www.uptime.jp



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation: references to old versions
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation: references to old versions