On 02/12/2013 11:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2013 02:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/2013 12:36 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/12/2013 12:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Uhm, so I take it AZ is Arizona. I don't object to the idea, but I
>>>> note
>>>> that AZ is also the 2-letter country code for Azerbaijan. IIRC
>>>> somebody
>>>> proposed using airport codes for PUG names to avoid conflicts; that
>>>> would make it PHXPUG I think, which sounds pretty horrible to me. I
>>>> admit we don't hear much from Azeri users, so maybe AZPUG is okay?
>>
>> Yeah, I think an Azerbaijan user group is unlikely, at best.
>>
>> Mind you, if the list needs modification *anyway*, is there something
>> wrong with using ArizonaPUG@postgresql.org?
>
> That seems a reasonable compromise.
yeah - I don't think we should use azpug@ for arizona and shadow an
entire country so I would thing that arizonapug@ seems like a sensible
alternative
Stefan