Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u
Дата
Msg-id 51A57F23.4060208@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade -u  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 05/28/2013 07:55 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:

>> Perhaps just documenting the behavior is all that is needed, but -U is
>> everywhere and I think that's a good thing.
>
> [ moved to hacker ]
>
> Wow, I never realized other tools used -U for user, instead of -u.
> Should I change pg_upgrade to use -U for 9.4?  I can keep supporting -u
> as an undocumented option.

Yes, -U makes the most sense as that is what is used with the other 
tools. I think you should just drop -u, this isn't something people are 
doing everyday (like psql). The backward compatibility argument is 
pretty slim.

JD




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Planning incompatibilities for Postgres 10.0
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump with postgis extension dumps rules separately