Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
Дата
Msg-id 5203EDDD.2020804@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?  (Tomonari Katsumata <t.katsumata1122@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
Список pgsql-hackers
On 08/08/2013 11:01 AM, Andres Freund wrote:

> I don't think anybody working on related areas of the code thinks it's
> rock solid.
> But anyway, I just don't see the downside of allowing problem
> analysis. You're free to do more testing, review, whatever before the
> release.

I'm 100% with you that we ought to keep the slow failover code around
and accessible to debugging.  What I'm asking is whether it should still
be explicitly available to users, and the default.  Based on your
feedback, it's sounding like it should be.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Merlin Moncure
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: StrategyGetBuffer optimization, take 2
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: question about HTTP API