Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)
Дата
Msg-id 5285.995472764@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PG rules! (RULES being the word ;->)  ("Dr. Evil" <drevil@sidereal.kz>)
Список pgsql-general
"Dr. Evil" <drevil@sidereal.kz> writes:
>> im just thinking about the same problem at this time and i am
>> convinced by others to put the business logic in the middleware and
>> just use SQL to store simple tables.

> I am familiar with that argument.  It's a good point in some
> instances, but it isn't gospel by any means.

I think it's reasonable to expect the database to support standard
SQL mechanisms like constraints.  There are some things like MySQL
that don't, but they're not really databases IMHO :-).

Obviously, if you care about vendor independence, you'll need to stay
away from nonstandard stuff like plpgsql functions.  But that shouldn't
convince you to lobotomize your use of standard SQL features.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mitch Vincent"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: restore single table
Следующее
От: "Richard Huxton"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Errors in logs