Re: COPY v. java performance comparison

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rob Sargent
Тема Re: COPY v. java performance comparison
Дата
Msg-id 533C80B8.9040709@gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: COPY v. java performance comparison  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Ответы Re: COPY v. java performance comparison  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 04/02/2014 03:11 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 04/02/2014 02:04 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>> On 04/02/2014 02:36 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2014 01:14 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
>>>> On 04/02/2014 01:56 PM, Steve Atkins wrote:
>
>> Well indeed there are copious LOG/HINT pairs along the lines of
>>
>>     LOG:  checkpoints are occurring too frequently ([8 <= n <=29]
>>     seconds apart)
>>     HINT:  Consider increasing the configuration parameter
>>     "checkpoint_segments".
>>
>> and these are during non-load periods.  During the COPYs I see
>> uncountable numbers of
>>
>>     WARNING:  pgstat wait timeout
>>
>> As you guys have probably already concluded, I have some config/tuning
>> to do.
>
> At a guess some of the problem comes from here:
>
> "The input file and postgres data are on separate disks, but only one
> controller."
>
> Have you tried moving the input file to the same disk as the server,
> to factor out the controller?
>
I labour under the delusion that it is through the controller one reads
and writes and that there might be some slight advantage to not doing
both against one drive if avoidable. Wrong again?




В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: COPY v. java performance comparison
Следующее
От: Alban Hertroys
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Lock problem