Re: [PATCH] document

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [PATCH] document
Дата
Msg-id 543620.1629899413@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] document  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> writes:
> When I applied the patch to the master, I found that the table entries for
> those function were added into the table for aclitem functions in the docs.
> I think this is not valid position and needs to be moved to the proper one
> (maybe the table for system catalog information functions?).

You have to be very careful these days when applying stale patches to
func.sgml --- there's enough duplicate boilerplate that "patch' can easily
be fooled into dumping an addition into the wrong place.  I doubt that
the submitter meant the doc addition to go there.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove Value node struct
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: prevent immature WAL streaming