Re: Partitioning WIP patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: Partitioning WIP patch
Дата
Msg-id 54EFB5BF.3030801@lab.ntt.co.jp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Partitioning WIP patch  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Partitioning WIP patch  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 27-02-2015 AM 03:24, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-02-26 12:15:17 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 26-02-2015 AM 05:15, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> I would love to have it for 9.5, but I guess the
>>> patch isn't nearly baked enough for that?
> 
>> I'm not quite sure what would qualify as baked enough for 9.5 though we
>> can surely try to reach some consensus on various implementation aspects
>> and perhaps even get it ready in time for 9.5.
> 
> I think it's absolutely unrealistic to get this into 9.5. There's barely
> been any progress on the current (last!) commitfest - where on earth
> should the energy come to make this patch ready? And why would that be
> fair against all the others that have submitted in time?
> 

I realize and I apologize that it was irresponsible of me to have said
that; maybe got a bit too excited. I do not want to unduly draw people's
time on something that's not quite ready while there are other things
people have worked hard on to get in time. In all earnestness, I say we
spend time perfecting those things.

I'll add this into CF-JUN'15. I will keep posting updates meanwhile so
that when that commitfest finally starts, we will have something worth
considering.

Thanks,
Amit




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: MemoryContext reset/delete callbacks