Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2014-09-17 14:56:42 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, on second thought I have doubts about the throw-error approach too.
>> We've allowed this historically for a very long time, so I'm afraid we'd
>> get a lot of pushback if we change the external behavior now.
> I have a hard time believing this. Are we really believing that there's
> a significant number of clients preparing whitespace?
I don't know about "significant number", but the case is specifically
called out as legal in the FE/BE protocol spec, for example here:
Therefore, an Execute phase is always terminated by the appearance of
exactly one of these messages: CommandComplete, EmptyQueryResponse
(if the portal was created from an empty query string), ErrorResponse,
or PortalSuspended.
If we change it, that's a protocol break, and I don't think that being a
tad cleaner is sufficient argument for that.
regards, tom lane