David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> Re: compulsively attempting to comply with every law everywhere, let's
> recall that a certain Search! engine company managed to get itself in
> a morally pretty reprehensible spot by "following the laws" of an
> oppressive regime. We needn't do the same.
We aren't actually doing any such thing. We are just making sure that
our distribution is split up in such a way that if someone *else* needs
to comply with such a law, it's not impractical to do so.
regards, tom lane