On 1/8/16 9:34 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 8 January 2016 at 13:36, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> I would agree except for the observation on toast indexes. I think
>>> that's an important enough use case that perhaps we should have both.
>> The exclusion of toast indexes is something we can remove also, I have
>> recently discovered. When we access toast data we ignore MVCC, but we still
>> have the toast pointer and chunkid to use for rechecking our scan results.
>> So a later patch will add some rechecks.
> Ah, interesting, glad to hear. I take it you're pushing your patch
> soon, then?
ISTM that this patch should be "returned with feedback" or "rejected"
based on the thread. I'm marking it "waiting for author" for the time
being.
Thanks,
--
-David
david@pgmasters.net