Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Дата
Msg-id 56E3633A.7030507@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 3/11/16 6:17 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> Not sure about the cost delay thing. Delays are disabled by default
> for manually issued VACUUM, so have doubts that that's useful.

Right, but you still have the option to enable them if you don't want to 
swamp your IO system. That's why CIC obeys it too. If I was running a 
consistency check on a production system I'd certainly want the option 
to throttle it. Without that option, I don't see running this on 
production systems as being an option. If that's not a goal then fine, 
but if it is a goal I think it needs to be there.

Isn't it just a few extra lines of code to support it?
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Is there a way around function search_path killing SQL function inlining? - and backup / restore issue