Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Karlsson
Тема Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Дата
Msg-id 5bad579d-7a99-74de-2311-b4f049da8b40@proxel.se
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Ответы Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/03/2018 05:57 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> Is there any meaningful distinction between "inlining," by which I
> mean converting to a subquery, and predicate pushdown, which
> would happen at least for a first cut, at the rewrite stage?

Sorry, but I do not think I understand your question. The ability to 
push down predicates is just one of the potential benefits from inlining.

Andreas


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Secondary index access optimizations
Следующее
От: Phil Florent
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: [Proposal] Add accumulated statistics for wait event