On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Joshua D. Drake<jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 07:44 +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On ons, 2009-09-02 at 12:52 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> > Isn't "core" supposed to be the release manager?
>>
>> The core team has historically been the release *maker* and has some
>> done management of the final phases of that process. But I think the
>> sentiment is growing that we need more management throughout the entire
>> release cycle.
>
> O.k. so a "release" team. Cool. I am assuming the team would be more
> directed toward upcoming major release versus minor releases to past
> revisions. We already pretty much have that under control between -core
> and -packagers. Yes?
+1.
...Robert