Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
От | Petr Jelinek |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6048008c-8028-59bd-39eb-d9cd49cc4cf8@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@ (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Maliing list request: pgsql-forks@
|
Список | pgsql-www |
Hi, On 08/08/2019 04:07, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > * Craig Ringer (craig@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 04:03, Nasby, Jim <nasbyj@amazon.com> wrote: >>> I'm on-board with that color of paint for the shed. (FWIW, I'm not >>> actually opposed to -extensions either; worst-case we split that list later >>> if needed.) >> >> Right. Does it matter, really? People working on these things will be well >> enough connected to -hackers and the community. >> >> Personally the only advantage I see to splitting it off -hackers is that it >> makes posts related to addins/forks/extensions/spoons/magic unicorn >> fairies/whatever more visible to that interest group. > > I agree that makes sense- if what they're talking about are > forks/extensions/unicorns, but the list of topics provided previously > looked like things that the fork folks want changed in core, and > anything along those lines belongs on hackers, not on some other list. > > This really seems like it's going to lead in a direction where the > various forks discuss on some other list things they want to see in core > (such as reducing the velocity of commits to core...), and then they're > going to spend a bunch of time on it and eventually propose something on > -hackers that ends up getting shot down, and I don't really think that's > going to be very satisfying for anyone. > > Let's keep the discussion about changes to core on -hackers. If there's > folks who want a list to get together and discuss how to address certain > limitations and how to work around them in the extensions system or the > set of hooks that are provided, that's great, but it should be clear > that it's that and not intended to be some kind of alternative list for > discussing core changes. > So when somebody wants to do some core changes in your company, they never discuss it with their colleagues before posting to -hackers? I see this list as two main purposes (at least for me, and I wasn't at BoF): - help each other using hooks/apis when there does not seem to be straightforward way of doing something (this does not belong to -hackers IMHO and there is no other C level hacker mailing list) - do initial discussion on ideas for extensibility enhancements of PostgreSQL - it does help to know what you are proposing is useful for others or that it can be ironed out to be more broadly useful -- Petr Jelinek 2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: