Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API
Дата
Msg-id 6133fd6f-609a-68b1-1cae-056bbbb8baad@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Expand palloc/pg_malloc API  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 09.09.22 22:13, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> I have updated this patch set to rename the _obj() functions to
>> _object(), and I have dropped the _ptrtype() variants.
> 
>> I have also split the patch to put the new API and the example uses into
>> separate patches.
> 
> This patch set seems fine to me, so I've marked it Ready for Committer.

committed

> I think serious consideration should be given to back-patching the
> 0001 part (that is, addition of the macros).  Otherwise we'll have
> to remember not to use these macros in code intended for back-patch,
> and that'll be mighty annoying once we are used to them.

Yes, the 0001 patch is kept separate so that we can do that when we feel 
the time is right.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: bt22kawamotok
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assertion failure in WaitForWALToBecomeAvailable state machine