Hi,
On May 22, 2019 7:39:41 AM PDT, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>On 2019-04-29 19:32, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another problem is that while "%lu" format specifiers are portable,
>> INT64_FORMAT is a *big* pain, not least because you can't put it into
>> translatable strings without causing problems. To the extent that
>> we could go over to "%zu" instead, maybe this could be finessed,
>> but blind "s/long/int64/g" isn't going to be any fun.
>
>Since we control our own snprintf now, this could probably be addressed
>somehow, right?
z is for size_t though? Not immediately first how It'd help us?
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.