Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Дата
Msg-id 6990.1252528300@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> maybe we could (re/ab)use parametrized types and define

> anyelement(1), anyelement(2), ..., anyelement(N) and then match them by
> the number in parentheses

Yeah, that idea occurred to me too.  The immediate practical problem is
that we don't store a typmod for function argument/result types.
I guess we could look into doing that ...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hannu Krosing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Ragged CSV import