Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Rui DeSousa
Тема Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Дата
Msg-id 6FEB60CF-D7E0-41F6-B125-8D53C81CEE2B@crazybean.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion  (richard coleman <rcoleman.ascentgl@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Список pgsql-admin


On May 1, 2023, at 10:34 AM, richard coleman <rcoleman.ascentgl@gmail.com> wrote:

As I've asked Ron, if pg_dump isn't fit for purpose, then what do you believe is?

If you need a logical backup then pg_dump is the right tool; as noted before but with better options to improve performance.

For backups; I would recommend physical backups which there are many solutions for.  I have personally used snapshots and believe that is the best solution.  It is the fastest and best solution to meet recovery time objective (RTO).  For example, I’m able to make a backup of a multi-terabyte database in under a second and multiple backups are cheap.  This allows me to do a backup of the system every 6 hours. The most expensive part of a database restore is going to be applying the WAL files when doing a point in time recovery (PITR).  This means that at most, I would only have to apply around 6 hours of WAL files; which can still take a long time given a high volume system.

In my opinion snapshots are the best solution but it will depend on your infrastructure and requires knowledge of the infrastructure and setting it up correctly.

If I could not use snapshots; I would look into either pgBackRest or pgBarman.   

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Следующее
От: richard coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion