Re: Tree-walker callbacks vs -Wdeprecated-non-prototype

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Tree-walker callbacks vs -Wdeprecated-non-prototype
Дата
Msg-id 722832.1663690513@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Tree-walker callbacks vs -Wdeprecated-non-prototype  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Tree-walker callbacks vs -Wdeprecated-non-prototype  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> (That verbiage is from the gcc manual; clang seems to act the same
> except that -Wcast-function-type is selected by -Wall, or perhaps is
> even on by default.)

Nah, scratch that: the reason -Wcast-function-type is on is that
we explicitly enable it, and have done so since de8feb1f3 (v14).
I did not happen to see this warning with gcc because the test runs
I made with this patch already had c35ba141d, whereas I did my
clang test on another machine that wasn't quite up to HEAD.
So we should have good warning coverage for bogus walker signatures
on both compilers.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH]Feature improvement for MERGE tab completion
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A question about wording in messages