> On 6 Mar 2023, at 21:55, Gregory Stark (as CFM) <stark.cfm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like Daniel Gustafsson, Andres, and Tom have all weighed in
> on this patch with at least a neutral comment (+-0 from Andres :)
I think the concept of a login event trigger has merits, even though it's kind
of a niche use case.
> It looks like the main concern was breaking physical replicas and that
> there was consensus that as long as single-user mode worked that it
> was ok?
Having a way to not rely on single-user mode and not causing an unacceptable
performance hit (which judging by recent benchmarks might not be an issue?). I
still intend to revisit this and I hope to get to it during this CF.
--
Daniel Gustafsson