Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commit id: 69f4b9c85f)
Дата
Msg-id 7393.1489088501@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would
>> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the
>> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use.

> Did we do anything about this?  Are we going to?

No, and I think we should.  Is it on the v10 open items list?
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Query fails when SRFs are part of FROM clause (Commitid: 69f4b9c85f)