Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guyren Howe
Тема Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Дата
Msg-id 7523152a-fa84-4794-898d-bc50f8d2c896@Spark
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?  (Raymond Brinzer <ray.brinzer@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?  (Raymond Brinzer <ray.brinzer@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Дерево обсуждения
I’m not proposing some crackpot half-baked idea here. There are well-defined and researched alternatives to SQL.

The most fully-developed you-can-use-today offering is Datomic, which uses Datalog as its query language. If you know Prolog, and how that is kind of database-like, Datomic is pretty much a variant of Prolog.

https://www.datomic.com

I don’t use it because it’s closed source.
On Feb 10, 2022, 21:15 -0800, Raymond Brinzer <ray.brinzer@gmail.com>, wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:56 PM Guyren Howe <guyren@gmail.com> wrote:
I feel like anyone who is defending SQL here isn’t aware of how much better the alternatives are, and how bad SQL really is.

Have you written a language description we can read and talk about?

--
Ray Brinzer

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Raymond Brinzer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?
Следующее
От: "David G. Johnston"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can we go beyond the standard to make Postgres radically better?