On June 9, 2016 7:46:06 PM PDT, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
>wrote:
>
>> On 2016-06-09 19:33:52 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > I played with it for a while, and besides
>> > finding intentionally caused corruption, it didn't flag anything
>> > (besides crashing on a standby, as in 2)).
>>
>> Ugh. Just sends after I sent that email:
>>
>> oid | t_ctid
>> ------------------+--------------
>> pgbench_accounts | (889641,33)
>> pgbench_accounts | (893854,56)
>> pgbench_accounts | (924226,13)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1073457,51)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1084904,16)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1111996,26)
>> (6 rows)
>>
>> oid | t_ctid
>> -----+--------
>> (0 rows)
>>
>> oid | t_ctid
>> ------------------+--------------
>> pgbench_accounts | (739198,13)
>> pgbench_accounts | (887254,11)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1050391,6)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1158640,46)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1238067,18)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1273282,22)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1355816,54)
>> pgbench_accounts | (1361880,33)
>> (8 rows)
>>
>>
>Is this output of pg_check_visible() or pg_check_frozen()?
Unfortunately I don't know. I was running a union of both, I didn't really expect to hit an issue... I guess I'll put a
PANICin the relevant places and check whether I cab reproduce.
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.