Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Дата
Msg-id 7671.1276268262@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>>> Btw., the SQL standard also defines -> for something else, so if you
>>> wanted to be really visionary, you could deprecate that one as an
>>> operator at the same time.
>> 
>> Ouch.  What does it define it to mean?

> Similar to C: Dereferencing a reference and accessing a member.

But a reference would be a datatype no?  So we could just regard that as
an ordinary operator.  I don't see a reason why it would conflict with
use of the same operator name for other datatypes (unlike the situation
with =>).
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Следующее
От: Jan Urbański
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_regress --use-existing does not appear in --help