On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Bryan Murphy <bmurphy1976@gmail.com> writes:
>> What I did was change seq_page_cost back to 1.0 and then changed
>> random_page_cost to 0.5
>
> [ squint... ] It makes no physical sense for random_page_cost to be
> less than seq_page_cost. Please set them the same.
>
> regards, tom lane
Done. Just saw the tip in the docs as well. Both are set to 0.5 now
and I'm still getting the good query plan.
Thanks!
Bryan