Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Erik Wienhold
Тема Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Дата
Msg-id 7njdkzeco47heg6tglzsm5wmmbb56vd66f7pta6gazb2k52viu@av3wruqnylpp
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>)
Ответы Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-docs
Дерево обсуждения 
On 2023-11-13 15:24 +0100, Erik Wienhold wrote:
> I also noticed that when people say "ISO 8601" they usually mean RFC
> 3389 or some subset of ISO 8601.

Forgot this fine visualization of the differences:
https://ijmacd.github.io/rfc3339-iso8601/

-- 
Erik

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Erik Wienhold
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: T is a mandatory date time separator in RFC3339 but documentation states differently