Re: pgAgent question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Benjamin Krajmalnik
Тема Re: pgAgent question
Дата
Msg-id 8511B4970E0D124898E973DF496F9B4357E0EB@stash.stackdump.local
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgAgent question  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Список pgadmin-support
Yes.
PgAdmin/pgAgent and PostgreSQL ar running on the same box.
RUnning the stored procedure even from a remote pgAdmin at the console results in the same 16 second performance.
 


From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage@vale-housing.co.uk]
Sent: Thu 4/20/2006 1:17 AM
To: Benjamin Krajmalnik
Cc: pgadmin-support@postgresql.org
Subject: RE: pgAgent question



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benjamin Krajmalnik [mailto:kraj@illumen.com]
> Sent: 19 April 2006 20:23
> To: Dave Page
> Subject: pgAgent question
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I have a quick question.
> I have a stored procedure which we use to calculate
> statistics against each test for the past 30 days.
> When I execute the stored procedure from the SQL editor in
> pgAdmin it takes it about 16 seconds to run.
> When it runs scheduled from pgAgent, it is showing a durtion
> of about 87 minutes.
>
> Any ideas what is causing such a disparate result?
> I have ran multiple exeutions to see if any one of them is a
> fluke, but no.  Every test which I run form pgAdmin is in the
> 15-17 sec range while every executio from pgAgent is in the
> 85 minute range.

Hi Benjamin,

Please mail support issues to the mailing list rather than private email
so others can help or benefit from any solutions found.

This is certainly a strange issue considering the work of a stored
procedure is all done on the server. Are you running pgAdmin and pgAgent
on the same box? Where's PostgreSQL running?

Regards, Dave.

В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgAgent question
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgAgent question