Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I don't think that's right. For one there's plenty types of DDL where no
> such locking exists, consider e.g. composite datums where additional
> columns can be added even after such a type is already used by another
> table.
Oh, indeed. Never mind the last paragraph.
--
Arseny Sher
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company