Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> I'm not objecting to your doing it, exactly, just suggesting that
> there are better things to spend your time on.
Heh, probably true :-)
I'll put this on the back-burner for now, and repost a complete patch
later if I get around to it.
> This I would object to, since it creates a risk of failure if anyone
> is incautious enough to write a non-constant argument to
> appendStringInfoString.
Agreed.
(Semi-OT note: allowing the user to extend the compiler to enforce
rules like this is a cool idea: http://metacomp.stanford.edu/)
-Neil