Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> writes:
> custom_variable_classes = 'x'
> custom_variable_classes += 'y'
> custom_variable_classes = 'z'
>
> That would result in the first 2 assignments being undone.
That's why I don't see how having as many files as you want to *for tool
based* configuration is a improvement of any sort.
It's certainly a cool piece of feature for those DBA who want to
organise their setup manually without having to add a lot of includes
into their current file. That's fine and convenient. Ok.
But as far as tools is concerned, that only looks awful from here.
I think we have 2 different needs here, and we're trying to abuse a
single mechanism for both. Maybe we need to accept that including all
files in a dir is nice for human organisation of config files but not so
much for automated tools. What they need is a clear API. Or two:
We need one API for editing setup of a live server, that's SET
PERSISTENT ... TO ... and friends (SET PERSISTENT ... APPEND TO ...),
and another one for tools which wants to act from a given setup with no
live server to talk to arround.
Is this second need really important? I guess it is, but the question
would better be explicit I think.
If it is, then we need to provide some kind of multi-language library
for editing our setup, or something so simple you don't need one.
Regards,
--
dim