Re: multimaster

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alexander Staubo
Тема Re: multimaster
Дата
Msg-id 88daf38c0706020658k56cb79aev438b02e4c1142d0e@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: multimaster  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Ответы Re: multimaster  ("Ian Harding" <harding.ian@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 6/2/07, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> wrote:
> I don't know if it's a general problem, but I've been involved in a
> using rails and it appears to have it's own way of declaring the
> database. It presumes to handle referential integrity and uniqueness in
> the application code (!).

I think you've been misled. True, Rails/ActiveRecord does bear the
signs of having been designed for MySQL/MyISAM, which has neither
transactions nor referential integrity, but this does not mean that
Rails does not support these constructs, or that Rails users don't use
them. I value my data integrity, so all my relations have RI, unique
constraints, null constraints, etc. as in any well-designed schema.

Alexander.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Rodrigo Gonzalez
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: multimaster
Следующее
От: "Jasbinder Singh Bali"
Дата:
Сообщение: Transactional DDL