On 6/2/07, Jasbinder Singh Bali <jsbali@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> I believe that if a database supports transactional ddl then ddl1 and ddl2
> would commit together as a batch
> And
> If a Db doesn't support this transactional DDL feature then ddl1 executes
> and commits without even caring about ddl2. Right?
Exactly right -- Oracle, for example, implicitly commits the
transaction when you execute a DDL statement such as "create table".
Alexander.