RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mikheev, Vadim
Тема RE: Proposal: replace no-overwrite with Berkeley DB
Дата
Msg-id 8F4C99C66D04D4118F580090272A7A23018BDE@SECTORBASE1
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
> Another option is to keep our heap table structure intact, and just
> Sleepycat DB for our indexes.  That may be a big win, with little
> downside.  Certainly something to think about.  It may work 
> better with MVCC, and allow fast sequential scans and fast heap
> access from the indexs, without having to go through the db structures
> to get to it.

But... we will still have to implement new smgr for tables and
redo/undo functions for heap access method.

Vadim


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Mikheev, Vadim"
Дата:
Сообщение: RE: WAL versus Postgres (or: what goes around, comes ar ound)
Следующее
От: Patrick Welche
Дата:
Сообщение: reading row in backend