fdw_private and (List*) handling in FDW API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tomas Vondra
Тема fdw_private and (List*) handling in FDW API
Дата
Msg-id 9055df78ae2d481d05ee805dfc63c3d5.squirrel@sq.gransy.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: fdw_private and (List*) handling in FDW API  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I've been exploring the new FDW API in the past few days, and I'm slightly
confused by the fdw_private fields. A few comments:

1) Generally all the API functions pass data using fields in the nodes
(e.g. GetForeignRelSize uses baserel->fdw_private etc.), but
PlanForeignModify simply returns the data, and BeginForeignModify accepts
that as a regular parameter. Is there any particular reason not to adapt
the same approach in all cases, i.e. either return the private data in all
cases (and pass as parameters), or passing them inside node/plan/...?

2) Is there any particular reason why PlanForeignModify/BeginForeignModify
require the fdw_private to be a List*, and not a generic pointer? I mean,
RelOptInfo declares fdw_private as a (void*) but the other structures
(e.g. ForeignScan) switches to (List*) for some reason. But all the
optimizer does with this data is this in createplan.c
   fdw_private_list = NIL;   i = 0;   foreach(lc, resultRelations)   {       ...       fdw_private =
fdwroutine->PlanForeignModify(root,node, rti, i);       fdw_private_list = lappend(fdw_private_list, fdw_private);
i++;   }
 
   node->fdwPrivLists = fdw_private_list;   return node;

If I read that correctly, it just accumulates all the lists into a single
list (and then unpacks that into individual lists in nodeModifyTable.c).
What is the reason for using (List*) here? I'd rather use a structure
here, not generic lists, YMMV. Or is there something I missed (e.g. future
plans)?

regards
Tomas




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: removing old ports and architectures
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Updatable view columns