On 5/10/17, 8:10 PM, "Masahiko Sawada" <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> I agree to report per-table information. Especially In case of one of
> tables specified failed during vacuuming, I think we should report at
> least information of tables that is done successfully so far.
+1
I believe you already get all per-table information when you do not specify a table name (“VACUUM VERBOSE;”), so I
wouldexpect to get this for free as long as we are building this into the existing ExecVacuum(…) and vacuum(…)
functions.
Nathan