Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gokulakannan Somasundaram
Тема Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Дата
Msg-id 9362e74e1002241104s711de2c5mc779a34f129ccfcf@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на A thought on Index Organized Tables  (Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Missed the group...

On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com> wrote:


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007@gmail.com> wrote:

That doesn't work because when you split an index page any sequential
scan in progress will either see the same tuples twice or will miss
some tuples depending on where the new page is allocated. Vacuum has a
clever trick for solving this but it doesn't work for arbitrarily many
concurrent scans.

Consider how the range scans are working today, while the page split happens.

The Seq scan should follow the right sibling to do the seq scan.

Gokul.


Actually thinking about what you suggested for a while, i think it should be possible, because the Oracle Fast Full Index scan essentially scans the index like that. I will try to think a way of doing that with Lehman and Yao...

Gokul.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move documentation of all recovery.conf option to a new chapter.
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete