Re: CommitFest rules

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема Re: CommitFest rules
Дата
Msg-id 937d27e10807031516s1303ceaeq87553ee1d7ba205f@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: CommitFest rules  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: CommitFest rules  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
>> Are you suggesting that omission of a patch on the 'fest' page means
>> that you are bumped from the fest?
>
> No, if you had submitted the patch on time then the correct next step
> is to get it added to the fest page; I don't think that should be
> controversial.  But the reviewers aren't gonna review it if it's not
> listed on that page...

Right, but the author should take some responsibility for ensuring the
patch is listed on time. What we don't want is forgotten patches
getting added at the last minute, right as the CommitFest manager is
wrapping things up having got 95% of the patches reviewed and the
other 5% in progress.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Andrew Hammond"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: the un-vacuumable table
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: the un-vacuumable table