Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes
Дата
Msg-id 983026.1680453512@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2023-04-01 06:02:47 +0200, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> +1 to put them in gist.sql and hash_index.sql.

> Unfortunately it turns out that running them in a parallel group reliably
> prevents cleanup of the dead rows, at least on my machine. Thereby preventing
> any increase in coverage. As they need to run serially, I think it makes more
> sense to keep the tests focussed and leave gist.sql and hash_index.sql to run
> in parallel.

If they have to run serially then that means that their runtime
contributes 1-for-1 to the total runtime of the core regression tests,
which is not nice at all.  Can we move them to some other portion
of our test suite, preferably one that's not repeated four or more
times in each buildfarm run?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Add "host" to startup packet
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: regression coverage gaps for gist and hash indexes