On 3/21/22 14:05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 20.03.22 23:55, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> Attached is a rebased patch, addressing most of the remaining issues.
>
> This looks okay to me, if the two FIXMEs are addressed. Remember to
> also update protocol.sgml if you change LOGICAL_REP_MSG_SEQUENCE.
Thanks. Do we want to use a different constant for the sequence message?
I've used 'X' for the WIP patch, but maybe there's a better value?
regards
--
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company