Re: search_path vs extensions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: search_path vs extensions
Дата
Msg-id A250F839-1A87-4BF3-8336-29E3C07613F4@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: search_path vs extensions  (Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On May 28, 2009, at 1:34 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:

> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>>>  "we all agree that a specific pg_extension schema is a good idea,  
>>> as
>>>   soon as user is free not to use it at extension install time".
>>
>> I don't think we all agree on that at all. ;-)
>
> Ooops, my mistake, as few people where taking that as implicit and  
> as a
> reasoning basepoint in their mails, I assumed we were past the  
> question
> already. Sorry to see that's too quick a conclusion... and thanks for
> pointing out the absence of consensus!

I somehow missed Andrew's mail, but I agree that we don't all agree on  
that point. I'm fine with having a standard schema for extensions,  
just as long as I can tell the installer to actually install it in a  
different schema if I want/need to do so.

Best,

David



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL Developer meeting minutes up