Le 7 janv. 09 à 22:21, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> a écrit :
>
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 12:54 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> So, barring objections, I'll go make this happen.
>
> I don't really understand this. Who can set up an inherited table
> structure but can't remember to turn on constraint_exclusion? That is
> the easiest part of the whole process by a long way. Nobody has this
> table design by accident, they've all been told how or read the docs.
>
> I'm not against the change so much as bemused by it.
I think the improvement is not in the usability part but the
performance benefit of avoiding lots of cpu cycles when there's no
gain to hope.
And I like the new option!
--
dim